Supreme Court of Florida· 12/8/1988
State v. Welker
Citations
- 536 So. 2d 1017
- 1988 WL 131578
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- testimony that the defendant’s wife gave consent to search was not hearsay, but a verbal act
- testimony that the defendant's wife gave consent to search was not hearsay, but a verbal act
- “[T]he giving of consent is a verbal act, and therefore testimony that someone has given consent is not hearsay.” (quoting Welker v. State, 504 So. 2d 802, 806 n.3 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987))
- overruling the specific holding in Tollett
- consent to record telephone conversation
- consent to record telephone conversation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grimes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WoinarowiczNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-08-16· cited 80×
- United States v. Fany MorenoSeventh Circuit· 2000-11-06· cited 43×
- State v. DillonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1994-07-20· cited 39×
- Mozo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-19· cited 15×
- Commerford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-03· cited 7×
- State v. AshleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-09-26· cited 7×
- A.J.M., a child v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-13· cited 2×
- Payne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-23· cited 1×
- United States v. Moreno, FanySeventh Circuit· 2000-11-06
- Samuel Yamil Mendez-Carmona v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-05-02
- Dawson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-09
- State v. OnoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-12
- Mendez-Carmona v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-05-02
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 1,155×
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 530×
- Newlon v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 261×
- Winfield v. Div. of Pari-Mutuel WageringSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-10-10· cited 147×
- Bernie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-01-07· cited 89×
- United States v. Frank John BonannoSecond Circuit· 1973-11-20· cited 79×
- In Re Florida Evidence CodeSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-06-28· cited 44×
- Atwaters v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-01-28· cited 44×
- Tollett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-01-10· cited 35×
- United States v. Willie James, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1974-06-05· cited 32×
- United States v. Enrique DiazFirst Circuit· 1976-05-05· cited 24×
- In Re Florida Evidence CodeSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-11-08· cited 24×
- Myrick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-08-05· cited 19×
- Lombardi v. Flaming Fountain, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-02-13· cited 15×
- Barber v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-03-23· cited 13×
- Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-09-17· cited 12×
- Welker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-01· cited 6×
- Palmer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-05· cited 6×
- State v. LeonardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-10-24· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.