United States v. Fany Moreno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the admission of evidence that the defendant refused to consent to a warrantless search was inconsistent with due process
• holding that the admission of evidence that the defendant refused to consent to a warrantless search was inconsistent with due process
• recognizing that courts have held or suggested that government may not cite defendant's refusal to consent to warrantless search as evidence that defendant knew search would produce incriminating evidence
• recognizing that courts have held or suggested that government may not cite defendant’s refusal to consent to warrantless search as evidence that defendant knew search would produce incriminating evidence
• stating in drug prosecution case that Fourth Amendment entitled a defendant to withhold consent to search and admitting evidence of that refusal is inconsistent with due process
• stating in drug prosecution case that Fourth Amendment entitled a defendant to withhold consent to search and admitting evidence of that refusal is inconsistent with due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).