State v. Watts
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 4856
Syllabus
ASSAULT – SELF-DEFENSE – EVIDENCE – CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – CONFRONTATION CLAUSE: Defendant's assault conviction was not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence where the responding police officer's testimony supported the victim's version of events, indicating that the victim did not hit defendant and disproving defendant's claim of self-defense. Where the responding officer did not testify as to any statements made by a nontestifying witness, but stated only that she relied on the statements in charging defendant with assault, there was no Confrontation Clause violation.
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.