Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2592

Syllabus

HEARSAY – CONFRONTATION CLAUSE – HARMLESS ERROR: trial court did not violate the prohibition against hearsay or the Confrontation Clause by admitting testimony that explained the steps in an officer's investigation, which did not include any statement by a non-testifying person even if the trial court committed a technical hearsay or Confrontation Clause error, such an error would be harmless because the state presented overwhelming evidence to establish defendant's guilt.

Judges: Bergeron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.