Skip to main content

State v. Watters

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 4399

Syllabus

App.R. 26(B), application to reopen, ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, withholding favorable evidence, disclosure, and prejudice. The court denied an App.R. 26(B) application to reopen. The argument that the state withheld favorable evidence was meritless when the state had disclosed the subject record during discovery and the contents of the record, a police statement taken from the victim, was not inconsistent with the victim's testimony.

Judges: Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.