Washington Supreme Court· 4/5/2007
State v. Watson
Citations
- 160 Wash. 2d 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statute is not unconstitutionally vague so long as “[o]rdinary people need not guess blindly at [its] meaning”
- \The due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires statutes to provide fair notice of the conduct they proscribe.\
- “The due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires statutes to provide fair notice of the conduct they proscribe.”
- statute is not unconstitutionally vague so long as \[o]rdinary people need not guess blindly at [its] meaning\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alexander, Sanders
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 425×
- State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court· 2013-04-11· cited 182×
- State v. AbramsWashington Supreme Court· 2008-03-20· cited 67×
- State v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-10-14· cited 48×
- State v. HarstadCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-08-24· cited 40×
- State v. HarstadCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-10-16· cited 38×
- City of Seattle v. MayWashington Supreme Court· 2011-10-21· cited 35×
- State v. ImmeltWashington Supreme Court· 2011-10-27· cited 34×
- In Re Personal Restraint of DyerWashington Supreme Court· 2008-08-07· cited 33×
- In re the Personal Restraint of DyerWashington Supreme Court· 2008-08-07· cited 33×
- In re the Detention of KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-10-23· cited 30×
- In Re Detention of KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-10-23· cited 27×
- State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-01-04· cited 20×
- State v. AmosCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-10-21· cited 20×
- State Of Washington v. Donald John HeutinkCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2020-02-18· cited 20×
- State v. NasonWashington Supreme Court· 2010-06-10· cited 17×
- State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-06-17· cited 16×
- State v. BatsonWashington Supreme Court· 2020-12-24· cited 15×
- State v. ElkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-06-16· cited 15×
- Department of Social & Health Services v. ZamoraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2017-03-06· cited 10×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 2,070×
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 1,862×
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 1,827×
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1939-03-27· cited 1,416×
- Rose v. LockeSupreme Court· 1975-11-17· cited 516×
- City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court· 1990-08-23· cited 388×
- State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court· 2005-07-07· cited 385×
- United States v. EnmonsSupreme Court· 1973-02-22· cited 381×
- City of Seattle v. EzeWashington Supreme Court· 1988-07-14· cited 234×
- State v. CoriaWashington Supreme Court· 1992-11-12· cited 220×
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court· 1997-05-01· cited 199×
- Haley v. Medical Disciplinary BoardWashington Supreme Court· 1991-11-07· cited 193×
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 160×
- Srcc v. Public Disclosure Com'nWashington Supreme Court· 1997-09-25· cited 155×
- City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court· 1967-02-02· cited 124×
- State v. DupardWashington Supreme Court· 1980-04-10· cited 117×
- State v. MacIolekWashington Supreme Court· 1984-02-16· cited 115×
- Collins v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1914-06-22· cited 100×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.