Court of Appeals of Washington· 10/16/2009
State v. Harstad
Citations
- 218 P.3d 624
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a defendant’s sexual purpose was inferred from contextual facts such as body positioning, state of undress, statements, and conduct
- A jury may determine that “parts of the body in close proximity to the primary erogenous areas” are intimate parts and that the defendant placing his hand on the victim’s upper inner thigh area constituted touching an “intimate part.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Agid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court· 1995-09-13· cited 2,396×
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court· 2007-04-05· cited 747×
- City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court· 1990-08-23· cited 388×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of RiceWashington Supreme Court· 1992-05-07· cited 355×
- State v. CraneWashington Supreme Court· 1991-01-31· cited 189×
- State v. AtsbehaWashington Supreme Court· 2001-02-01· cited 174×
- State v. JoyWashington Supreme Court· 1993-04-29· cited 164×
- State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court· 1967-03-09· cited 115×
- State v. RenfroWashington Supreme Court· 1982-01-15· cited 108×
- State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court· 2007-04-05· cited 93×
- Olderbak v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-11-02· cited 90×
- State v. GarrettWashington Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 78×
- State v. TownsendWashington Supreme Court· 2001-01-04· cited 77×
- State v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-01-11· cited 75×
- State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-09-17· cited 67×
- In Re the Welfare of AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-10-24· cited 58×
- State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-09-30· cited 56×
- State v. WoodleyOregon Supreme Court· 1988-08-30· cited 48×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-07-14· cited 47×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.