Skip to main content

State v. Watkins

Citations

  • 148 N.H. 760
  • 813 A.2d 435
  • 2002 N.H. LEXIS 193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a curative instruction “would have been appropriate” where the prosecutor “blatantly misstated the law” during closing argument
  • concluding that admission of conviction for prior offense was unduly prejudicial under Rule 404(b)(2)(C) in trial for later commission of same offense
  • probative value must be considered in the context of its incremental value and the extent to which the issue is established by other evidence
  • “Because of the similarity of the [prior] conviction . . . and the charged crimes, the jury may have been persuaded to find the defendant guilty, at least in part, because he had previously committed the same offense.” (quotation omitted)
  • curative instruction appropriate where prosecutor “blatantly misstated the law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barry, Brock, Dalianis, Nadeau, Rsa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.