Supreme Court of South Carolina· 11/26/1973
State v. Watkins
Citations
- 203 S.E.2d 429
- 262 S.C. 178
- 1973 S.C. LEXIS 207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing obscenity statute on remand from the United States Supreme Court and affirming conviction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Littlejohn, Moss, Lewis, Bussey, Brailsford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-30· cited 59×
- People v. NeumayerMichigan Supreme Court· 1979-02-05· cited 47×
- State v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-01-15· cited 10×
- Town of Mount Pleasant v. ChimentoSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-11-21· cited 7×
- Watkins v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1974-07-25· cited 2×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 1,264×
- United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Super 8MM. FilmSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 524×
- Heller v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 523×
- Roaden v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 483×
- Kaplan v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 319×
- United States v. OritoSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 281×
- Alexander v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 111×
- State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-08-09· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.