Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/15/1975
State v. Thompkins
Citations
- 211 S.E.2d 549
- 263 S.C. 472
- 1975 S.C. LEXIS 409
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- knowingly means actual knowledge, but one can not avoid “knowing” by shutting one’s eyes to what would otherwise be obvious
- knowingly means actual knowledge, but one can not avoid \knowing\ by shutting one's eyes to what would otherwise be obvious
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis, Moss, Bussey, Brailsford, Littlejohn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-01-14· cited 26×
- State v. BumanglagHawaii Supreme Court· 1981-09-10· cited 24×
- State v. HoueySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-09-10· cited 16×
- State v. SterlingSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-02-29· cited 7×
- O'Neill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-08-22· cited 5×
- O'NEILL v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-27· cited 3×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 2,897×
- Heller v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 523×
- Roaden v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 483×
- Jenkins v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1974-06-24· cited 409×
- State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-08-09· cited 21×
- State v. YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-07-31· cited 20×
- State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-11-26· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.