Skip to main content

State v. Washington

Citations

  • 288 S.W.3d 312
  • 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “distinctive tattoo” would be “ ‘individualistic’ trait[]” that “could have applied equally to any venireperson”
  • “Even if a prosecutor’s criterion might result in the disproportionate removal of a certain racial group, the disproportionate impact does not turn a prosecutor’s actions into a per se violation of the equal protection clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohen, Norton, Odenwald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.