Skip to main content

State v. Washington

Citations

  • 356 N.W.2d 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding information charging defendant with theft on or about January 5, 1983, did not preclude defendant's conviction for thefts in February 1982, when evidence admitted tended to show commission of a theft in 1982
  • holding information charging defendant with theft on or about January 5, 1983, did not preclude defendant’s conviction for thefts in February 1982, when evidence admitted tended to show commission of a theft in 1982
  • defendant convicted of second-degree theft and found to be habitual offender entitled to have sentencing court consider deferred judgment
  • where district court failed to exercise discretion in sentencing because it erroneously believed that it had no discretion under the law, the case had to be remanded for resentencing
  • interpreting Iowa Code section 902.8 as allowing probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Considered by Reynoldson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.