Skip to main content

State v. Draper

Citations

  • 457 N.W.2d 600
  • 1990 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 157
  • 1990 WL 83664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant’s interpretation of pertinent sentencing statutes because it would lead to an absurd result
  • stating ”[a]t most, section 814.20 might preclude us from increasing a sentence imposed by the district court in cases where the district court’s sentence is legal”
  • noting when a sentencing court departs upward or downward from a legislatively authorized sentence, the pronounced sentence is a nullity subject to correction on appeal or later
  • increasing sentences for drug violations to five years when the district court impermissibly imposed only three years
  • noting the district court is not permitted to disregard the mandates of the statute specifically defining mandatory minimums
  • stating an illegal sentence “is a nullity subject to correction, on direct appeal or later”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Larson, Carter, Layorato, Neuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.