Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 7/7/1987

State v. Washington

Citations

357 S.E.2d 419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[E]ven if defendant had objected to the search, we question whether defendant’s presence and objection would vitiate his mother’s consent ... that did not depend on his authority in the first place.”
“[A]ctual use is irrelevant where [defendant’s mother] retained sufficient control over the premises that defendant assumed the risk that she might at some time exercise her right to enter upon and inspect the premises and permit others to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.