Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/1/1993
State v. Washington
Citations
- 432 S.E.2d 448
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a defendant may not complain, on appeal, about the admission of evidence elicited by his own counsel
- appellant cannot on appeal complain about the admission of evidence which she elicited
- “The granting of a mistrial is a matter within sound discretion of the trial judge, and his decision will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion amounting to an error of law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-09-14· cited 101×
- State v. WassonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-11-13· cited 37×
- State v. GambrellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-05-05· cited 24×
- State v. GoodwinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-12-08· cited 13×
- State v. LakeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-01-11· cited 10×
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-04-24· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.