Court of Appeals of Washington· 7/22/2008
State v. Walters
Citations
- 188 P.3d 540
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \We review de novo claims of manifest constitutional error\
- “We review de novo claims of manifest constitutional error.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-09· cited 2,295×
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 2,097×
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 1,668×
- Price v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1970-06-15· cited 784×
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court· 2004-06-03· cited 229×
- In re the Personal Restraint of AndressWashington Supreme Court· 2002-10-24· cited 171×
- State v. BradshawWashington Supreme Court· 2004-10-14· cited 154×
- In Re HintonWashington Supreme Court· 2004-11-18· cited 129×
- In re the Personal Restraint of HintonWashington Supreme Court· 2004-11-18· cited 129×
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2000-11-02· cited 98×
- In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2000-11-02· cited 98×
- In Re Personal Restraint of AndressWashington Supreme Court· 2002-10-29· cited 61×
- State v. ErvinWashington Supreme Court· 2006-11-30· cited 60×
- State v. CorradoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-05-10· cited 58×
- State v. HallWashington Supreme Court· 2008-01-31· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.