State v. Wallace

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he mere presence of the contraband in the closet established that a crime had been committed and that someone was criminally liable.\
• “Since the appellee was. not found to be in actual possession of the narcotics, the state had the burden of circumstantially establishing his constructive possession of the drugs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Snell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-25· cited 18×
• State v. Dionne
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-15· cited 15×
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-17· cited 10×
• J.J.N. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-02· cited 6×
• State v. Holzbacher
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-16· cited 5×
• JJN v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-02
• K. T. B. v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-11-22
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-07
• Phillips v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-22

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-03-03· cited 180×
• State v. Allen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-07-21· cited 155×
• Burks v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-01-21· cited 66×
• Hively v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-07-16· cited 65×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-09· cited 19×
• Jordan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-20· cited 5×