State v. Wall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the same definition of vulnerability is contemplated in both the juvenile and the adult sentencing schemes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Melton
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-09-23· cited 38×
• State v. J.N.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-02-03· cited 25×
• State v. T.C.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-13· cited 17×
• State v. P.B.T.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-05-26· cited 13×
• State v. Ogden
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-09-05· cited 11×
• State v. Radcliff
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-08-06· cited 6×
• State v. TC
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-13· cited 2×
• State v. J.P.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-08· cited 2×
• State v. JN
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-02-03· cited 1×
• State v. PBT
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-08-24

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Evans
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-10-26· cited 131×
• State v. Armstrong
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-08-14· cited 111×
• State v. Norton
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-12-30· cited 80×
• State v. Van Gorden
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-11-24· cited 63×
• State v. Wood
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-11-04· cited 47×
• State v. Stumm
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-11-20· cited 45×
• State v. Harp
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-04-04· cited 43×
• State v. P.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-06-07· cited 33×
• State v. Martin
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-08-02· cited 27×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-11-15· cited 8×
• State v. Fisher
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-03-04· cited 3×