State v. Radcliff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• regarding imposition of \option B\ sentence, the lack of written findings does not preclude appellate review if the trial court's oral ruling sets forth the facts upon which it relies
• regarding imposition of \option B\ sentence, the lack of written findings does not preclude appellate review if the trial court's oral ruling sets forth the facts upon which it relies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Meade
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-10-11· cited 17×
• State v. T.C.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-13· cited 17×
• State v. E.J.H.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-05-26· cited 14×
• State v. TC
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-13· cited 2×
• State v. EJH
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-05-26

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. McAlpin
  Washington Supreme Court· 1987-07-16· cited 104×
• State v. Strong
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-07-23· cited 52×
• State v. Strauss
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-06-12· cited 45×
• State v. Fellers
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-05-21· cited 37×
• State v. Wall
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-12-15· cited 12×
• State v. Fisher
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-05-20· cited 6×
• In re the Welfare of Latson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-10-17· cited 5×