Skip to main content

State v. Waldron

Citations

  • 228 W. Va. 577
  • 723 S.E.2d 402
  • 2012 WL 171326
  • 2012 W. Va. LEXIS 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[i]t is important to emphasize that, aside from the testimonial versus nontestimonial issue, a crucial aspect of Crawford is that it only covers hearsay, i.e., out-of-court statements ‘offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”’
  • “Typically, this Court will not address issues that have not been properly briefed.” (citations omitted)
  • “It is important to emphasize again that, aside from the testimonial versus nontestimonial issue, a crucial aspect of Crawford[ v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.