United States v. John L. Tolliver and Archie Dunklin, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that admissions by a party-opponent are not subject to the Confrontation Clause because they are excluded from the hearsay rule
• holding informant’s statements in recorded conversation with defendant were nontestimonial because admitted only to provide context for incriminating statements by defendant
• “Statements providing context for other admissible statements are not hearsay because they are not offered for their truth.”
• statements providing context for other admissible statements are not hearsay because they are not offered for their truth
• “statements providing context for other admissible statements are not hearsay because they are not offered for their truth.”
• “State- ments providing context for other admissible statements are not hearsay because they are not offered for their truth.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).