State v. Wagoner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “[a]s in Thompson, ORS 137.106 did not prevent the court from imposing restitution [beyond the 90-day deadline] in order to provide the victim a remedy by due course of law, after it was discovered that her constitutional right to restitution was violated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gallegos
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-02-05· cited 16×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-19· cited 5×
• State v. Rieker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-03-04· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Barrett
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-05-27· cited 29×
• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-06-26· cited 12×
• State v. McLaughlin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-05-25· cited 10×
• State v. Ferrara
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-02-13· cited 10×
• State v. McLaughlin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-21· cited 9×
• State v. McLaughlin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-03· cited 5×