Oregon Supreme Court· 5/27/2011

State v. Barrett

Citations

255 P.3d 472
350 Or. 390
2011 Ore. LEXIS 483

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that violation of victim’s rights in that case had occurred before trial court had sentenced defendant
noting court's reluctance to reach constitutional issues before determining what ordinary laws authorize, require, or prohibit
setting out brief history of the enactment of Article I, section 42, and ORS 147.500 to 147.550
setting out brief history of the 12 enactment of Article I, section 42, and ORS 147.500 to 147.550
construing constitutional and statutory provisions to authorize court to vacate sentence and conduct resentencing hearing to remedy violation of constitutional right to be present at sentencing after court accepted plea agreement without notice to victim
expedited procedural path provided by ORS 147.517, ORS 147.530(5), and ORS 147.535(2) designed to allow victims to assert claims for violation of constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz, Durham, Kistler, Walters, Linder, Landau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.