Skip to main content

State v. Vrabel

Citations

  • 301 Kan. 797
  • 347 P.3d 201
  • 2015 Kan. LEXIS 231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the statutory right to suppress evidence is not restricted to defendants who are aggrieved by an unconstitutional search and seizure
  • noting a confidential informant cannot legally possess contraband to give to police officers unless acting as an agent of law enforcement
  • \'acquiescence or acceptance of assistance'\ by the invaded jurisdiction does not constitute a request for assistance from the foreign officers
  • a confidential informant cannot legally possess contraband to give to police officers unless acting as an agent of law enforcement
  • officers’ organized and planned controlled drug buy with confidential informant to build case against defendant in furtherance of duty to preserve the peace fell within scope of K.S.A. 22-2401a
  • officers' organized and planned controlled drug buy with confidential informant to build case against defendant in furtherance of duty to preserve the peace fell within scope of K.S.A. 22-2401a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.