· 10/14/2011
State v. Ottinger
Citations
- 264 P.3d 1027
- 46 Kan. App. 2d 647
- 2011 Kan. App. LEXIS 148
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that this court is bound by our Supreme Court's precedent
- holding that this court is bound by our Supreme Court's precedent
- “This court, however, is duty bound to follow Kansas Supreme Court precedent, absent some indication the Supreme Court is departing from its previous position.”
- Court of Appeals observing its duty to follow established Supreme Court precedent in the absence of some indication of a departure by the court from that holding
- our court duty bound to follow Kansas Supreme Court precedent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marquardt, Buser, Atcheson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.