Skip to main content
· 10/14/2011

State v. Ottinger

Citations

  • 264 P.3d 1027
  • 46 Kan. App. 2d 647
  • 2011 Kan. App. LEXIS 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that this court is bound by our Supreme Court's precedent
  • holding that this court is bound by our Supreme Court's precedent
  • “This court, however, is duty bound to follow Kansas Supreme Court precedent, absent some indication the Supreme Court is departing from its previous position.”
  • Court of Appeals observing its duty to follow established Supreme Court precedent in the absence of some indication of a departure by the court from that holding
  • our court duty bound to follow Kansas Supreme Court precedent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marquardt, Buser, Atcheson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.