State v. Velez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \conserve[ing] scarce judicial resources\ is a legitimate government interest
• recognizing that \conserve[ing] scarce judicial resources\ is a legitimate government interest
• recognizing that \conserve[ing] scarce judicial resources\ is a legitimate government interest
• “‘An evidentiary hearing is necessary only if the party requesting the hearing raises a significant, disputed factual issue.’” (quoted source omitted)
• defendant did not dispute that police made a good faith effort to find defendant before his birthday
• allegation that State deliberately delayed charging defendant to avoid juvenile court jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Shaun M. Sanders
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2018-05-18· cited 44×
• State v. Hager (In Re Commitment of Hager)
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2018-04-19· cited 17×
• State v. Schroeder
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1999-02-04· cited 13×
• State v. Radder
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2018-05-16· cited 8×
• State v. David Hager, Jr.
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2018-04-19
• State v. Rick
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2018-11-13

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mullaney v. Wilbur
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
• United States v. Scott Sophie
  Seventh Circuit· 1990-04-24· cited 134×
• State v. Avery
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-11-01· cited 26×
• State v. Becker
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1976-12-14· cited 26×
• Miller v. Quatsoe
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1972-10-17· cited 19×
• United States v. Carter
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-06-02· cited 7×