United States v. Scott Sophie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that statements from the government akin to “I cannot promise anything” but “I’ll see what we can do” are insufficient to trigger an evidentiary hearing
• ruling that statements from the government akin to “I cannot promise anything” but “I’ll see what we can do” are insufficient to trigger an evidentiary hearing
• ruling that statements from the government akin to “I cannot promise anything” but “I’ll see what we can do” are insufficient to trigger an evidentiary hearing
• rejecting argument that evidence showed multiple conspiracies merely because members changed over time
• responding to a defendant’s claim that “the district court erred by not enforcing an alleged plea agreement between him and the government, or, at least, holding an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the alleged agreement existed”
• “Under Rule 801(d)(2)(E), a conspirator’s statement is admissible against conspirators who join the conspiracy after the statement is made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).