State v. Varner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that prospective application is presumed absent a specific provision or clear legislative intent to the contrary
• recognizing that prospective application is presumed absent a specific provision or clear legislative intent to the contrary
• correct penalty generally is the one in effect at the time of sentencing, although common law prohibits imposition of punishment that exceeds punishment provided for when offense was committed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pierce v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-10· cited 75×
• State v. Dickey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-09-26· cited 46×
• State v. Gay
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-24· cited 23×
• State v. Dawson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-04-03· cited 14×
• State v. Bolin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-02-05· cited 5×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2002-11-26· cited 5×
• State v. Rider
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-01-22· cited 5×
• State v. Heath
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-06-02

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hercules Inc. v. South Carolina Tax Commission
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-01-19· cited 65×
• State v. Cooler
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1889-02-08· cited 10×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1846-01-15· cited 5×
• State v. Addington
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1831-06-15· cited 1×
• State v. M'Carty
  Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas· 1793-11-15· cited 1×