Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/3/2013
State v. Dawson
Citations
- 402 S.C. 160
- 740 S.E.2d 501
- 2013 WL 1319782
- 2013 S.C. LEXIS 59
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \A sentence will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion when the ruling is based on an error of law.\
- \A sentence will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion when the ruling is based on an error of law.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Hearn, Kittredge, Pleicones, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 2006-05-01· cited 1,409×
- Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2012-06-21· cited 1,010×
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court· 2012-06-21· cited 916×
- State v. PittmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-06-11· cited 186×
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1908-02-24· cited 147×
- State v. DickeySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-09-26· cited 46×
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-07-25· cited 37×
- State v. GaySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-24· cited 23×
- State v. VarnerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-11-09· cited 13×
- State v. ManselSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1898-06-29· cited 11×
- State v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-10-29· cited 10×
- State v. CoolerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1889-02-08· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.