State v. Vannoy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• with model 5000 intoxilyzer, rather than the GCI, police could have given the defendant the same, sample used in the state’s test
• state has no duty to gather evidence for a defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• MacK v. Cruikshank
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-09-16· cited 50×
• Snyder v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1996-12-27· cited 40×
• State v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-04-13· cited 12×
• State v. Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-07-30· cited 11×
• State Ex Rel. Verburg v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-11-01· cited 7×
• State v. Rumsey
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-08-31· cited 6×
• State of Arizona v. Thomas L. Dean
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-01-12· cited 5×
• State v. Gaffney
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-02-24· cited 3×
• State of Arizona v. Glenda Lorraine Rumsey
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-08-31