State v. Vance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[S]entences claimed to be excessive are only reviewable on direct appeal and not by post-conviction application.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Yarbough
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-10-07· cited 697×
• State v. Ervin
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-10-16· cited 25×
• State v. Yarbough
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-07-16· cited 22×
• State v. Mosch
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-12-31· cited 20×
• State v. Odom
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1971-01-27· cited 20×
• State v. Ebron
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1973-03-02· cited 10×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiRienzo
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1969-03-04· cited 124×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1964-07-07· cited 60×
• A. J. Industries, Inc. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 41×
• State v. Hicks
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1969-07-07· cited 34×
• State v. Carter
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1969-07-15· cited 30×
• State v. Mills
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1968-03-04· cited 30×
• State v. Provoid
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1970-06-22· cited 28×
• State v. Maxey
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1964-03-16· cited 25×
• State v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1952-03-31· cited 24×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1965-12-06· cited 14×
• State v. Billingsley
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1966-01-24· cited 9×
• State v. Jefferson
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1956-06-25· cited 4×