State v. DiRienzo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant’s suppression argument was not properly before the court where no motion in accordance with the court rule was made in advance of trial to suppress the evidence taken by the police, nor was any objection m,ade at trial
• upholding admission of testimony that defendant was \dangerous\ as proof of witness' credibility and motive, rather than of defendant's bad character
• “possession of recently stolen property permits an inference that the possessor knew that the property had been stolen, unless the possession is satisfactorily accounted for”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).