Skip to main content

State v. Unruh

Citations

  • 281 Kan. 520
  • 133 P.3d 35
  • 2006 Kan. LEXIS 221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the State's failure to appeal from defendant's resentencing meant the Court of Appeals lacked jurisdiction to consider any issues related to it
  • finding case did not involve multiple acts and unanimity instruction not required when State alleged defendant constructively possessed all methamphetamine found in van
  • finding the case did not involve multiple acts where State alleged defendant constructively possessed all methamphetamine found in the van
  • no multiple acts requiring unanimity instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert, Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.