Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/28/2006
State v. Unruh
Citations
- 281 Kan. 520
- 133 P.3d 35
- 2006 Kan. LEXIS 221
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the State's failure to appeal from defendant's resentencing meant the Court of Appeals lacked jurisdiction to consider any issues related to it
- finding case did not involve multiple acts and unanimity instruction not required when State alleged defendant constructively possessed all methamphetamine found in van
- finding the case did not involve multiple acts where State alleged defendant constructively possessed all methamphetamine found in the van
- no multiple acts requiring unanimity instruction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Luckert, Lockett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.