Skip to main content

State v. Escobar

Citations

  • 523 S.W.3d 545
  • 2017 WL 2644090
  • 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 627

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting plain-error review under Rule 30.20 for instructional error despite the defendant’s failure to object and renew the objection in a motion for new trial
  • finding no reasonable argument that manifest injustice occurred where there were no substantial conflicts in the evidence regarding the incidents of abuse
  • finding the defendant-had failed to prove that the error affected the verdict where the defendant a'sserted only a general defense and the State focused its inquiry on two particular incidents
  • although the verdict directors did not assure a unanimous verdict, no manifest injustice occurred where the record shows the State focused at trial and in closing argument on specific instances of abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ahuja, Ardini, Witt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.