State v. Ulmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant could be prosecuted under either credit card fraud statute or forgery statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• MacK v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1980-01-08· cited 61×
• People Ex Rel. Babbitt v. Green Acres Trust
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-04-08· cited 21×
• State v. Wallen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-01-13· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-08-31· cited 12×
• State v. Sutton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-09-23· cited 8×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-11-15· cited 6×
• State v. Mussiah
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-08-02· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Ali
  California Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 110×
• People v. Gingles
  California Court of Appeal· 1973-06-19· cited 14×
• People v. Liberto
  California Court of Appeal· 1969-06-30· cited 14×
• State v. Culver
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-10-24· cited 13×
• People v. Cobb
  California Court of Appeal· 1971-02-03· cited 7×
• Sykes v. State Ex Rel. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-12-26· cited 6×
• State v. Thomas
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-10-04· cited 5×