Skip to main content

State v. Tyson

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 5049

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in sentencing defendant-appellant because there is not clear and convincing evidence that defendant-appellant's sentence is not supported by the record or otherwise contrary to law. The defendant-appellant's consecutive sentences are not contrary to law because the trial court made the appropriate R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings.

Judges: Preston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.