State v. Tucker
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 574
Syllabus
Anders appeal. No non-frivolous issues for appellate review. There is no arguable merit in challenges to the trial court's denial of a continuance, defense counsel's failure to file a suppression motion and failure to object to evidence of an arrest warrant, or the trial court's imposition of a three-year prison sentence to be served consecutively to another sentence. The appellant's assignments of error related to the alleged admission of \tainted/adulterated evidence\ also lack arguable merit. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court· 1981-07-01· cited 1,145×
- State v. PelfreyOhio Supreme Court· 2007-02-07· cited 171×
- State v. FairmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-12-16· cited 26×
- State v. MarangerOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-13· cited 12×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-17· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.