State v. Tucker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ [Abandonment is a fact question generally determined by a combination of acts and intent”
• \[A]bandonment is a fact question generally determined by a combination of acts and intent\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rockett v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-12-05· cited 25×
• State v. Gray
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-10-30· cited 25×
• State v. Howard
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-06-15· cited 23×
• Wilson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-02-13· cited 13×
• Cardozo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1983-02-23· cited 11×
• Kirk v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1992-05-27· cited 10×
• Colyer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1983-06-22· cited 8×
• Ingle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1983-05-18· cited 5×
• Abbott v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1991-11-18· cited 5×
• Vanderpool v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1982-02-17· cited 3×
• Pyles v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1996-12-11· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. James Andrew Colbert and Michael Beryl Reese
  Fifth Circuit· 1973-02-14· cited 309×
• United States v. Gary Lavaughn Wilson
  Ninth Circuit· 1973-02-12· cited 61×
• Morton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-03-07· cited 51×
• State v. Osborn
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1978-05-30· cited 45×
• Lupro v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-11-09· cited 44×
• United States v. Terrance Karl Alden
  Eighth Circuit· 1978-05-23· cited 28×
• Thom v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1970-03-02· cited 27×
• Baggett v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1973-05-28· cited 4×