Supreme Court of Kansas· 2/15/2013

State v. Trujillo

Citations

296 Kan. 625
294 P.3d 281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

clarifying that constitutional harmless error test in State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, Syl. ¶ 6, 256 P.3d 801 [2011], does not apply in unanimity cases
explaining that the test could be phrased as \'whether the reviewing court is firmly convinced that the jury would have reached a different verdict'\ with no practical difference between the tests
noting court’s decision to omit the ‘real possibility’ language from Voyles test to avoid confusion with the constitutional harmless error test
noting court’s decision to omit the ‘real possibility’ language from Voyles test to avoid confusion with the constitutional harmless error test
noting court’s decision to omit the “real possibility” language from Voyles test to avoid confusion with the constitutional harmless error test
noting court’s decision to omit the “real possibility” language from Voyles test to avoid confusion with the constitutional harmless error test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.