State v. Trujillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although police informant made numerous requests for drugs, conduct did not entitle defendant to an entrapment defense
• affirming a trial court’s refusal to instruct a jury on the defense of entrapment because there was insufficient evidence to support the defense
• describing Corpus delicti as a “mere scintilla” of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lively
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-08-29· cited 166×
• State v. Chapin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-09-04· cited 41×
• State v. Votava
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-04-17· cited 38×
• State v. Buford
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-11-30· cited 19×
• State v. Larose
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2008-03-20· cited 9×
• State of Washington v. Douglas Virgil Arbogast
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-12-24· cited 6×
• State of Washington v. Bogar Rivera-Zamora
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-03-07· cited 5×
• State v. Arbogast
  Washington Supreme Court· 2022-03-31· cited 5×
• State v. Trujillo
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-08-22· cited 1×
• PRP Of Darcy Dean Racus
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-04-18

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Riker
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-03-03· cited 161×
• State v. Davis
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-09-10· cited 78×
• State v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-02-02· cited 68×
• State v. Galisia
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-01-21· cited 53×
• State v. Chapin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-09-04· cited 41×
• State v. Enriquez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-10-06· cited 10×
• State v. Hansen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-07-15· cited 9×
• State v. Vinson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-05-02· cited 3×