Skip to main content

State v. Enriquez

Citations

  • 725 P.2d 1384
  • 45 Wash. App. 580
  • 1986 Wash. App. LEXIS 3357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even assuming the defendant's testimony was corroborated by informant, entrapment fails as a matter of law
  • informant pointing out defendant could support his drug addiction by selling drugs not improper inducement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scholfield, Ringold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.