Utah Supreme Court· 5/20/2014
State v. Trotter
Citations
- 2014 UT 17
- 330 P.3d 1267
- 761 Utah Adv. Rep. 32
- 2014 Utah LEXIS 72
- 2014 WL 2090556
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Padilla does not extend the Sixth Amendment to require counsel to advise defendants about the collateral consequence of sex offender registration
- holding that Padilla does not extend the Sixth Amendment to require counsel (continued
- As sex offender registration is a collateral consequence of a guilty plea, \neither defense counsel nor the trial court is constitutionally compelled to inform a defendant of the registration requirement before a guilty plea may be accepted as knowing and voluntary.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. SylvesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2016-11-09· cited 23×
- Junious Taylor, Jr. v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-12-07· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2018-06-14· cited 17×
- Farhane v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 2023-08-11· cited 6×
- State v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2015-04-16· cited 5×
- State v. LittlejohnCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2021-07-09· cited 2×
- Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Kyle D. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court· 2018-06-14
- State v. DenteCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2025-06-26
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court· 2010-03-31· cited 5,017×
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court· 1998-03-03· cited 3,515×
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 1,492×
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court· 1999-02-24· cited 1,485×
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals· 1995-10-24· cited 1,066×
- Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-02-20· cited 962×
- People v. PequeNew York Court of Appeals· 2013-11-19· cited 751×
- Fong Haw Tan v. PhelanSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 354×
- Femedeer v. HaunTenth Circuit· 2000-08-28· cited 290×
- United States v. GonzalezFirst Circuit· 2000-01-25· cited 117×
- Americo Michel v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1974-12-02· cited 117×
- Saadiq v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-05-21· cited 94×
- United States v. HurlichTenth Circuit· 2002-06-21· cited 87×
- United States v. Richard W. SuterSeventh Circuit· 1985-02-14· cited 70×
- Aldus v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-03-14· cited 58×
- Joseph George, Jr. v. Charles Black, Warden, Nebraska State PenitentiaryEighth Circuit· 1984-04-16· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-12-07· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.