State v. Triplett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Defendant may not use his reply brief to make new arguments on appeal. A reply brief is not an avenue to correct the deficiencies contained in the original brief.” (citations, quotation marks, and alterations omitted)
• “Defendant may not use his reply brief to make - 10 - IN RE: G.C.C. Opinion of the Court new arguments on appeal. A reply brief is not an avenue to correct the deficiencies contained in the original brief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Huml v. Huml
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-03-19· cited 18×
• In re: Giddens
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-03-03
• State v. Wiles
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-03-17
• The N.C. State Bar v. Key
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-06-18

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Doyle v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
• Fletcher v. Weir
  Supreme Court· 1982-03-23· cited 749×
• United States v. George Agee
  Third Circuit· 1979-06-18· cited 63×