Court of Appeals of Washington· 7/19/1999
State v. Tribblet
Citations
- 96 Wash. App. 662
- 980 P.2d 794
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that the plain meaning of a restitution statute using “and” with regard to two criteria required the application of both criteria
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cox
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- State v. FjermestadWashington Supreme Court· 1990-06-07· cited 165×
- State v. ChesterWashington Supreme Court· 1997-08-07· cited 141×
- State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 101×
- State v. BunnerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-04-14· cited 29×
- State v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-11-12· cited 20×
- State v. DubackCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-03-23· cited 9×
- Department of Labor & Industries v. DennyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-01-11· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.