Skip to main content

State v. Treat

Citations

  • 680 P.2d 250
  • 67 Haw. 119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that grand jury transcripts fully informed the defendant of the nature and cause of the accusation against him
  • concluding that grand jury transcripts fully informed the defendant of the nature and cause of the accusation against him
  • holding that a theft in the first degree charge was not defective where it tracked the statutory definition of the offense because the charge alleged all of the statutory elements of the offense
  • holding that the defendant’s access to grand jury transcripts was sufficient to provide notice, even if the details of the crime 24 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND THE PACIFIC REPORTER *** were not fully alleged in the indictment
  • holding that the defendant’s access to grand jury transcripts was sufficient to provide notice, even if the details of the crime 24 *** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND THE PACIFIC REPORTER *** were not fully alleged in the indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.