State v. Yonaha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the charge omitted the element of intent, \the charge was fatally defective for failure to allege a necessary element\
• holding that because the charge omitted the element of intent, “the charge was fatally defective for failure to allege a necessary element”
• following Jendrusch and holding that “the [oral] charge was fatally defective for failure to allege a necessary element”
• reversing conviction because omitted element of intent in reciting the charge
• reversing conviction because omitted element of intent in reciting the charge
• conviction reversed because accusation could not be construed to state an offense; prejudice not addressed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).