West Virginia Supreme Court· 3/26/1982
State v. Totten
Citations
- 289 S.E.2d 491
- 169 W. Va. 729
- 1982 W. Va. LEXIS 745
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- whether weapon was immediately available and accessible to use is ordinarily a question of fact for the jury
- whether weapon was immediately available and accessible to use is ordinarily a question of fact for the jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 3,483×
- Husty v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 447×
- Colorado v. BannisterSupreme Court· 1980-10-20· cited 267×
- Ensor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-06-04· cited 198×
- State v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-11-25· cited 86×
- State v. GoodwinNebraska Supreme Court· 1969-06-27· cited 40×
- State v. FrisbyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1978-06-27· cited 25×
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-01-21· cited 13×
- Dubin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1979-01-04· cited 10×
- Phillips v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1971-11-05· cited 10×
- Sutton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-01-14· cited 9×
- People v. McClendonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1959-11-06· cited 7×
- Collier v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1970-05-01· cited 7×
- People v. RJAColorado Court of Appeals· 1976-11-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.