West Virginia Supreme Court· 3/29/1983
State v. Shingleton
Citations
- 301 S.E.2d 625
- 171 W. Va. 668
- 1983 W. Va. LEXIS 495
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The 9 mobility of the vehicle, given the time necessary to secure a warrant, provided the necessary exigent circumstances justifying the warrantless search.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. StarkeyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1978-05-02· cited 220×
- Taylor v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1981-12-04· cited 97×
- State v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-11-25· cited 86×
- State v. PlantzWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1971-04-27· cited 66×
- State v. DuvernoyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1973-04-03· cited 66×
- State v. FlintWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-03-11· cited 53×
- State v. ValenzuelaArizona Supreme Court· 1979-01-10· cited 31×
- State v. WinstonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-07-15· cited 26×
- State v. BoswellWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-07-15· cited 24×
- State v. TottenWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-03-26· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.