State v. Tisa Farrow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “it is not clear how applying [constitutional] protections to nontestimonial evidence, including, presumably, the field sobriety exercises themselves, would lead to a requirement that police warn an individual that her refusal may be used as evidence in court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Theodore Dmitri Colehamer
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2023-07-14· cited 1×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pennsylvania v. Muniz
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-18· cited 976×
• State v. Fish
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-04-27· cited 76×
• State v. Pelican
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-07-23· cited 75×
• Opinion of the Justices to the Senate
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-05-12· cited 66×
• Commonwealth v. Blais
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-11-03· cited 56×
• State v. Hoenscheid
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-09-06· cited 44×
• State v. Gray
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-06-03· cited 35×
• TD Banknorth, N.A. v. Department of Taxes
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2008-09-19· cited 32×
• State v. Ovitt
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2005-07-06· cited 29×
• State v. McGuigan
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2008-08-14· cited 28×
• State v. Blouin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-06-26· cited 17×
• State v. Rheaume
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2004-04-09· cited 17×
• State v. Ford
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2010-05-14· cited 16×
• State v. Curavoo
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-01-04· cited 13×
• State v. McCarthy
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2012-05-04· cited 10×
• Foster and Gridley v. Winner
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1999-08-02· cited 9×
• State v. Allard
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-12-19· cited 8×