State v. Thornton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the state’s argument that circumstantial evidence that the defendant stole a stereo justified an award of restitution; because the defendant did not admit to stealing the stereo, restitution for the stereo could not be imposed
• defendant’s theft of cash and tires from a car, the crimes for which he was convicted, did not make possible the theft of the car’s stereo—a crime he had not admitted and with which he was not charged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kirkland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-01-07· cited 34×
• State v. Sigman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-06-19· cited 15×
• State v. Thorpe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-26· cited 9×
• State v. Parsons
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-08-23· cited 9×
• State v. McDonald
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-09· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Dillon
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-12-09· cited 98×
• State v. Doty
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-11-10· cited 20×
• State v. Hazlitt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-01-29· cited 9×